This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of utilise.

AMD-Ryzen-Feature-3

AMD's Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, and 1700 all debuted earlier this month, officially putting Intel on observe that Team Green was dorsum and prepare to fight. At present, in that location'due south a rumor making the rounds that Ryzen eighteen may non be the end of AMD'south desktop ambitions. Supposedly, there'south a chip coming that would go toe-to-toe with Intel's HEDT line.

Obligatory reminder: Accept this with enough common salt to kill a donkey. Here'due south the text of the rumor, as reported past FLCLimax, at Overclock.net:

Public noesis by now but AMD has a new HEDT platform coming out in a couple of months. You'll run into more than of it at Computex I believe.

It'southward a 16 core /32 Thread, quad channel behemoth. And it is insanely quick in the tests that Ryzen is already excelling at. Then Cinebench, and all other related productivity programs. The gaming issues that were causing the Ryzen AM4 CPUs to behave erratically to say the least take been ironed out. It'south akin to a newer revision on a newer platform. This should exist competing with the Xeon and of grade 6950X Intel offers for $1700~$1800USD, just at most $1,000 USD if non less for some Skews(sic). Coming soon. CPSs(sic) are pretty big physically, almost twice the size of surrent (sic) 6950X CPUs and a bit more peradventure. And if you were hoping for pins, nope it's strictly LGA! Information technology's NOT viii channel, only Quad.

One thing I desire to call out correct from the start. FLCLimax'due south claim that "the gaming issues… accept been ironed out," is non, to the absolute all-time of my cognition, truthful. It's true some motherboards had early on BIOS problems that fabricated them perform more poorly than they should've in gaming benchmarks. AMD said this issue is considering games compiled prior to Ryzen do not accurately detect its capabilities or take advantage of the CPUs architecture. And AMD has already said the issue isn't the Windows ten scheduler, despite some users beingness convinced this was the case. Some games may indeed be ironed out if developers release patches to better Ryzen's operation, but the issue isn't in the thread scheduler and it doesn't seem to be something AMD can improve on its ain.

Fabric

AMD has shown how it connects two Naples fries together with its Infinity Fabric, only connecting 16 cores together in a single socket is nevertheless difficult if y'all want to minimize bottlenecks.

Now, as for the rest of the rumor, it's by no means impossible. AMD is already planning to build a 32-core Ryzen with eight memory channels (one per CCX). A xvi-core device could easily turn out to be a quad-aqueduct part, and that would compete well confronting Intel's HEDT lineup.

The ane thing I'd circumspection against, even so, is treating this rumor as if its either proof AMD will launch such a fleck or that this kind of processor would be desirable to most enthusiasts. First, AMD will be required to cut clock speeds. The more cores you accept, the lower your maximum clock is going to be. That's always been true for server chips from both companies. Fifty-fifty allowing for some variation between product SKUs, college core counts mean lower clock speeds or similar clock speeds at a substantially higher TDP. Intel's E7-8894 v4 (24 cores) has a base clock of 2.4GHz and a boost clock of 3.4GHz in a 165W TDP. The E7-8891 v4 (10 cores) has a base clock of ii.8GHz and a boost of 3.5GHz in the same 165W ability envelope.

Which of these CPUs is "better" depends entirely on how multi-threaded your workloads are, of form, but the trend holds clear. If AMD wants to build a 16-core Ryzen, fifty-fifty in a 150W TDP, it's going to have to give up some clock speed to go there. It might brand a fabulous workstation chip, simply I'd bet you'd go better gaming performance from a different CPU in AMD's lineup.

Would a 16-cadre Ryzen dial holes in Intel'due south product family? Possibly. At that place is some business organization that by joining that many CCX'southward together, the relatively limited 22GB/s of bandwidth betwixt the CCX's could evidence a scaling bottleneck with that many chips to handle. And it's absolutely possible, fifty-fifty likely, that gamers would see little benefit from this kind of firepower. Games are typically designed to run on higher clocks with lower threads; few platforms tin saturate threads to the point that they count for more than raw clocks.

Still, it'll be interesting to run across if this rumor proves true. Depending on what AMD pulls off, it might be able to regain market place share, even at the highest end of the non-server market.